“Stopped listening after the first line
“It has been 6 weeks since Hamas launched its attack on Israel and Israel responded….”
Still starting history at October 7, so as to paint a picture of good versus evil, where good = occupation, advanced military, known for war crimes, colonization and killing children? At least use similar language so it’s not obvious bias?
If it’s acceptable to consider Israel’s large scale massacre of civilians as a response to something, shouldn’t you also consider Hamas’ attack as a response, given the fact that Israel has been illegally occupying West Bank, and blockading Gaza, imprisoning and killing children for decades etc. I mean Palestine is defined as an occupied territory, have you not learned that actually Palestinians have the right to resist whereas the occupier legally doesn’t have the right to bomb the prison camp it has created?
I mean surely as journalists you don’t live under a rock. Or you should be obliged not to be wilfully ignorant. But maybe you’re actively trying to push a biased narrative?
Starting the podcast with bias and misinformation when the world is now seeking truth, = unfollow.”
SKH7763 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
11/25/23