Yenifer, from Provincia De Panamá, Panama is the lucky listener setting out the first question for discussion today -  “Are we brainwashed into thinking working hard gets us wherever we want? Is that just a form of enslavement? If we were taught to have a mindset of working smarter, would that impact those trying to keep us in our seats? We’re told to get educated, get better jobs, work harder, yet the hours get longer for little reward”. William posits that the essence of productivity lies in working smarter—an approach that inherently encapsulates working harder by virtue of focused and efficient energy utilisation. Stuart, on the other hand, scrutinises the very notion of hard work, likening it to a form of modern servitude. He argues that the affluent are not the ones toiling; rather, they orchestrate the labour of others. Stuart advocates for self-employment as the epitome of working smartly, challenging the conventional wisdom that equates hard work with success. He contends that employment can sometimes stifle one’s creative vitality. In their dialogue, Stuart and William explore the dynamics of labour and intellect. They deliberate on the distribution of one’s vigour throughout the day and confront the prevailing workplace culture that often expects employees to render uncompensated overtime. William’s resolution is a commitment to discovering methods to enhance efficiency without necessarily increasing effort. Stuart’s resolution is a call to break free from habitual conformity, urging a re-evaluation of one’s work patterns. Abid, Jendouba Governorate, Tunisia sets the second question today - “Should we be focusing on making the world seas and oceans drinkable as a way of counteracting the climate crisis? Empires have been built of lesser concepts. Will that be the next of Earth's assets humanity fights over?” William expresses that the desalination of seawater, while a technological marvel, is an endeavour marked by high energy consumption. He advocates for a more judicious use of existing freshwater reserves as an alternative. Stuart expands by suggesting the extensive use of water in industrial processes such as the production of cement and concrete, as well as in agricultural practices like cattle rearing, locks water away in the processes. He posits that water is poised to become a contentious asset, a catalyst for conflict among human societies. Stuart suggests that the oceans and seas may hold the keys to addressing the climate crisis. However, he cautions that even with advancements rendering desalination more sustainable, the presence of microplastics remains a significant concern. The conversation between William and Stuart underscores the complexity of water management in the context of environmental sustainability and industrial demands. It reflects a broader conversation about the balance between technological progress and ecological stewardship. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠[email protected] We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one