“It’s a nice podcast. I was addicted to listening until he started doing graphic descriptions of the weather, the trees, the sky, how the victim wiped the sweat off her brow as she walked out of her home, etc.
I don’t want to hear a fiction writing/audio book with such cheesy descriptions.
I also don’t understand the point of going into extreme detail about say, the ages, siblings, occupations of the parents of a murder victim who was born in 1913. It has no relevance to the crime and seems like filler.
Please stop using quote/end quote.
Other than that, most cases he chooses are interesting and it seems like he does his research. I like that he doesn’t rehash the most well known cases that everyone does over and over.
The theory portion is always extremely interesting and with the exception of a few episodes I’ve heard, extremely fair and balanced.
I’d give it a chance and start from the very beginning. I’m hoping he makes some
Adjustments and stops with the unnecessary descriptions in the beginning but most early episodes are a major thumbs up.”
CarolineVivien via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/09/23