Good research but one sided
Now, here’s the problem, If you make a podcast about mysteries, like UFOs for example, and keep calling the people that believe in them: “Paranoids”, “Obsessed”, “Ridiculous”, “Manipulated”, etc. and phrases like “In spite of the evidence against it they’re not satisfied”, “the UFO mythology”, etc. with the insinuation that they’re “stupid”, and not giving equal importance to both sides, how can you expect that people interested in this topics to keep hearing your podcast? You have good research but it’s obvious in your arguments that you consider this believes stupid. Call your podcast “The Debunkers” and we’ll know what to expect.
RTGL via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 05/17/18
More reviews of Unexplained Mysteries
Subscribed because I already did to the Cults podcast, you guys should create some content for YouTube I think it could go well.
AesopRock! via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 03/10/18
Love this show! Analysing well known mysteries, adding the detailed stories behind them less known by most. Informative and entertaining!
Elin1408 via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 05/15/18
Well organized, skeptical, and entertaining analysis of the Mona Lisa! The fovea effect part was so interesting!
magster via · 03/03/18
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.