Immigrants' rights groups in New Mexico have expressed strong opposition to reports of plans by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to expand their detention facilities in the state. These plans have sparked significant controversy, highlighting the ongoing debate around immigration policies and the treatment of undocumented individuals in the United States. The proposed expansion comes at a time when immigration policy remains a highly polarizing issue across the nation. Advocates argue that increasing the capacity of ICE detention centers will only exacerbate existing problems within the immigration system, such as overcrowding and inadequate access to legal resources for detainees. These facilities have long been criticized for their conditions, with numerous reports highlighting issues such as insufficient medical care, substandard living conditions, and instances of abuse. Local advocacy groups, including the New Mexico Immigrant Law Center and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New Mexico, have been vocal in their opposition. They argue that the expansion contradicts efforts to humanize and reform immigration enforcement. These organizations have been working tirelessly to push for policies prioritizing the rights and well-being of immigrants, calling for alternatives to detention that are more humane and cost-effective. The expansion plans have also drawn criticism from several public officials, who emphasize the need for a comprehensive and compassionate approach to immigration. They stress that detention should not be the default response for individuals seeking asylum or better opportunities in the U.S. Instead, these officials advocate for community-based alternatives that allow immigrants to reside with family or sponsors while awaiting legal proceedings. In addition to the moral arguments against expanding detention facilities, economic considerations also play a significant role. Detaining immigrants is an expensive endeavor, with costs often outweighing those of alternative measures like ankle monitors or community supervision programs. Critics argue that these funds could be better spent on programs that address the root causes of immigration and support the integration of immigrants into U.S. society. The controversy in New Mexico reflects a broader national conversation about the role of detention in immigration enforcement. With changing administrations and shifting political priorities, the future of ICE's detention policies remains uncertain. However, the growing advocacy for reform indicates a strong desire for a different approach—one that respects the dignity of immigrants and acknowledges their contributions to American society. Ultimately, the debate over detention facility expansion is more than just a local issue; it is a reflection of the larger challenges facing the U.S. immigration system. As discussions continue, it is crucial for policymakers to consider the voices of those most affected by these decisions and to work towards solutions that align with the country's values of compassion and justice for all.