Induced Seismicity in the Raton Basin (In-Person Presentation)
Listen now
Description
Margaret Glasgow, U.S. Geological Survey Fluid-injection induced seismicity has been ongoing for more than two decades in the Raton Basin, a coal-bed methane field located on the Colorado-New Mexico border. The uptick in seismicity began in 2001 approximately 10 years ahead of the central United States average. Sparse seismic instrumentation existed prior to 2015. Prior to denser instrumentation beginning in 2016, three broad zones of seismicity were identified. Each zone was suggested to host a 10-15 km long normal fault. However, denser instrumentation combined with the application of automated and machine learning methods reveal that the major zones of seismicity are composed of a series of short faults, ~1-3 km long. The faults have variable strikes and predominately normal slip. Unlike some regions of induced seismicity, the earthquake statistics (e.g., b-value, interevent time) for the Raton Basin are indistinguishable from those found in tectonic settings. Seismicity has greatly diminished in one of the three zones, the Trinidad zone, despite having hosted some of the largest earthquakes in the basin including a Mw 5.3 in 2011. We built an earthquake catalog for this zone from 2008-2022 that heavily relied on one legacy U.S. Transportable Array station. This time range includes multiple topics of interest – the lead up to the Mw 5.3 mainshock and the decline in seismicity beginning in ~2016. Unlike previous results which suggested the mainshock ruptured an anomalously long fault, ~10 km, and was low stress drop, we suggest the mainshock ruptured ~5.5 km and within an hour triggered seismicity up to ~5 km from the mainshock rupture. The recent decline in seismicity in the Trinidad zone is most likely predominately due to the 80% reduction in nearby wastewater injection but another contributor may be the diminished tectonic stress following the 2011 Mw 5.3 mainshock earthquake sequence. The Trinidad zone provides an opportunity to better understand this potentially inadvertent but seemingly effective mitigation.
More Episodes
Omar Issa, ResiQuant (Co-Founder)/Stanford University A study by FEMA suggests that 20-40% modern code-conforming buildings would be unfit for re-occupancy following a major earthquake (taking months or years to repair) and 15-20% would be rendered irreparable. The increasing human...
Published 11/13/24
Martijn van den Ende, Université Côte d'Azur Already for several years it has been suggested that Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) could be a convenient, low-cost solution for Earthquake Early Warning (EEW). Several studies have investigated the potential of DAS in this context,...
Published 10/09/24