“Many non-partisan media shows suffer from this issue, but you can’t platform right wing hacks and pretend you are unbiased.
Putting them on as if they speak in good faith is in itself a form of bias.
Sarah Isgur is a right wing hack and has no credibility on the law or in any legitimate legal circle.
On almost any issue Sarah debates and equivocates in bad faith. As per usual, her conservative method of analysis is to accept what the court says as fact, despite the obvious holes, and then say “look, it must be right, they wouldn’t spin or lie and they have no agenda.”
People understand that it is very difficult to get a reasonably mature or “normal” conservative to speak outside their bubble, but that shouldn’t mean you lower the bar for them.
Don’t platform people who are fail to critically assess legal opinions and instead only see them through their political bias. Sarah Isgur cannot remove her conservative colored glasses. Amplifying that viewpoint injured the show’s nonpartisan stance.”
lamby183 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/02/24