“Can’t really review 2 episodes, but so far, I am concerned that there will be too much reiteration of content regarding the common problems that exist for all of the families of missing loved ones. This podcast will end up telling the same story over and over again. (Ie. The good and bad of social media. The inherent problems that families face when trying to wrap up the accounts, estate, and insurance issues of an adult that is missing but not declared dead. Family members that are advocating for the missing have to reiterate the missing loved one’s story over and over again.)
This podcast’s intended audience seems like it would be geared to the actual families of missing loved ones. Similar to a support group, it demonstrates that one is not alone in the context of having a missing loved one. Going forward, I hope the podcast content becomes more exceptionally unique in each episode. If we learn about “problem x” in episode 1, put it away and do not reiterate “problem x” in subsequent episodes. I just worry that each episode will be telling the same story but using a different voice. I want this podcast to be a success. Personally, I hope it evolves into each episode spending 90% of the episode covering the events leading up to the disappearance, and then cover the events post-disappearance up leading up to it becoming a “cold case,” or when police lose interest. The last 10% should be how the family is handling life without their loved one, and what could be asked of the public. Again, many of these families face common problems. Some of them are really personal. I hope the focus of the episode shifts to 90% of the case and 10% of how the family is contending with the same, or very similar, problems that the other families are facing.”
Expollutions via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/11/20