Would it kill you to do proper editing?
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Over 20 minutes of wasted time: recording multiple takes of the same ad read, mindless banter back and forth with the engineer/producer and periods of silence make for an amateur attempt at a podcast.
As for content, the interviews jump around in a disjointed way, and the podcast often ends without an effective conclusion.
You should be capable of so much better. Disappointing.”
Paul Welter via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/17/17
More reviews of Wrongful Conviction
“The story is compelling and Raymond is incredibly engaging and sympathetic. Unfortunately, his story is frequently disrupted by Flom, who interrupts, asks leading questions, talks about himself, and is generally off-putting. I'm sure he does great work in pursuing exonerations, but in the...”Read full review »
Bar prep problems via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/05/16
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This is an issue I'm very interested in and needs to be seriously addressed. The problem is it leaves out key facts/evidence that makes things from the prosecution side more understandable which reduces the interviewers credibility. For example in the Sunny Jacobs case, they note that there...”Read full review »
Jedi391 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/15/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“UNLISTENABLE!! - please tell your guests that they need to drink water!!! no matter how compelling the story, listenening to the fleshy, smacking around of their sticky, flabby tounge is like nails on chalkboard. so frustrating that you do all this work and then let us down at the 11th hour. What...”Read full review »
Annannnxxxx via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/02/17
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
