Missing Details, Sometimes Ignores Biggest Issues
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Since the people being interviewed know the questions in advance, why do their answers almost always refer to generalities rather than specifics? And how can your interviewees and hosts ignore obvious and in your face true answers? Example- just listened to a podcast that stated Americans have $1.6 Trillion in “excess” savings. How could neither the host nor the interviewee not mention the trillions of dollars the government has thrown into the economy over the past year? One of the biggest answers to why “excess” savings is obviously that most Americans received a ton of money from the federal government over the past year, and the majority of those Americans never lost any income and therefore didn’t need those “relief” funds. When you miss such an obvious point, it hurts your credibility.”
informed citizen2 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/06/21
More reviews of WSJ Your Money Briefing
“like the different topics. very good and tks a lot!”
98hu via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/12/11
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The host just reads what is written down but doesn’t seem to pay attention with well formed questions during interviews. Also, STOP with the drama keywords. TERROR, FEAR, GREAD, etc. Lost respect for this podcast because of the deliberate trigger wording that you use to spike people’s emotions.”
joe27272728 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/24/18
“Too often while reporting the news they completely ignore the way economics actually works in favor of being politically correct”
Hero Norbert via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/09/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
