“The two guests on the first episode expressed virtually no dissenting views. This sounded like a discussion where the two hosts, at least, had been either reticent to ask meaningful questions or they had not thought much about the topics before. How could you possibly have a discussion like this that lasts 30 minutes without asking the Chicago guests if there were any cities in Indiana with the same violent crime rate as Chicago given that he reasons the gun laws in Chicago do not work because of bordering Indiana. Respectively, how could David French not have the issue raised about the abuse of red flag laws and the risk to citizens who have committed no crime and are simply dislike by the complainant? Was like listening to two hosts that don’t have much experience asking serious questions. I suggest change the show title or have dissenting views in the future.”
John Davdi via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
09/20/22