“I think I’ve listened to 98% of all episodes, but in the past couple months to a year the quality of the content / insights has gone completely down hill. I understand Jim may have needed to take a step back due to personal issues, but then going in so hard on insights and conclusions based on obviously minimal research is just hard to listen to.
I have listened to Jim on other podcasts for years, and his takes lately are in complete contradiction to what he has said in the past, especially noted in coverage of the Richard Allen trial. I’m not sure what’s going on, but it does seem to stem from a lack of research, preparation before episodes. I would be completely fine with that, but just be upfront, and not so passionate when all your foundation is misinformed.
Either more thorough research is need upfront, or the dialogue needs to leave more room for not being fully informed. I would much rather hear that they don’t know the full case, but here are some insights and arguments from both sides, then argumentative discourse belittling others opinions when you don’t even have all the facts.
I love this show and BOTH of the hosts, I just think a tone reset is needed.”
canonmoch via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/10/24