WOW! Very bias, not objective reporting
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I would not recommend this podcast for the following reasons:
1.) One side (KR is innocent) is actual interview dialogue specifically for this podcast, however, MWP is in opposition to everything said in those interviews.
2.) The other side (KR is guilty) is only cherry-picked dialogue from the trial. He agrees with everything this side said.
3.) MWP is completely inaccurate in his interpretation of the medical examiner testimony.
4.) MWP is completely inaccurate about the science related to how this could have been an auto vs peds accident.
5.) MWP assumes because words were said on the stand, the person saying them was 100% telling the truth.
6.) MWP accepts the scientific testimony of Trooper Paul, which is the modern day equivalent of believing the earth is flat and we have gods on Mt Olympus.”
bunnylasvegas via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/18/24
More reviews of Crossing the Line with M. William Phelps
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“New format much better. Good choice on changes.”
LaLo12234 via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
05/30/22
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“So I’m a huge Paper Ghosts fan and I love that I can still listen to Phelps weekly. I love his voice and I love the banter with producer. She is a great addition to the episodes. I love you M. William Phelps!”
mak2217 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/09/22
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Liked this first episode and it gives me a good expectation about this show. Didn’t know Cristina , she added a great value to this episode. Worth to listen.”
mauromantilha via Apple Podcasts ·
Brazil ·
10/12/21
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
