“Wow. What a misrepresentation of the facts. It reads as though you didn’t do thorough research, glossing over glaring irregularities in the story, and simply placing music over trial testimony. And that’s a show/podcast? Jumping on a little too late in this story without doing much homework. Solid D+. I know more about the facts of the case and trial testimony than you do. Not a flex, but I’ve really looked into it from all sides. You’d have to be brain dead to believe: A.) He didn’t go in the house and B.) He was hit by a car.
Between the deleted Google searches, dog scratches on his arm, his beat up face, Apple Watch data, destroyed phones of federally subpoenaed witnesses, “butt dials” in the middle of the night between the people in the house that night, etc. I could go on and on. But again, I’ve researched this case at length. You have clearly not.”
Disappointed # 4746483 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/11/24