“There's one basic rule for effective podcasting: GIVE YOUR CO-HOST EQUAL TIME AND LET THEM SPEAK OR THE ENTIRE PREMISE OF THE SHOW IS LOST. I thought we'd get the overview, then each host shares their opinion, they'd debate the topic and end with their conclusions. Here's why it was impossible for that to happen: THE MALE CO-HOST HIJACKED THE ENTIRE PODCAST TO "MANSPLAIN" HIS OPINION DOWN THE LISTENER'S THROATS. The other host never got to summarize the incident. Why? The male host made it all about himself, that he "didn’t feel sorry" for the woman, "she should have spoken up" how he'd expertly handle the situation if he was the woman during the dateBLAHBLAHBLAH. When he chose to steamroll over his co-host's ability to speak without being interrupted, it reaffirmed why/how obnoxious intimidation makes people (regardless of gender) reluctant to speak up when someone has arrogantly crossed the line.”Read full review »
LadyBMacD via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/07/18
“I'm really loving this podcast! Waiting for the 3rd episode! As someone who has served on a jury in a murder trial, this dialogue is very true to life. The arguments and debates the jurors have in this podcast are the exact same ones that I've heard in deliberations myself. Loving it!”Read full review »
coolsignature via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/19/17