Prof. Baude is the best
On one of the most recent episodes, it was mentioned how many people write-in to leave reviews complaining about how annoying Prof. Baude is and praising Prof. Epps. I respectfully dissent. I won’t trod out my particular annoyances with Prof. Epps (I have more class than that, and they’re done talking about SCOTUS ethics, so moot) but I think it’s appropriate to sing the praise that Prof. Baude deserves because other commenters are so grotesque. (The sort of praise that Prof. Epps would say that Prof. Baude will sheepishly duck from.) Fanboying is embarrassing, but Prof. Baude has a relatively large cult following, especially at Scalia Law School (FWIW), other than those dishonest “conservatives” that love particular political personalities more than the Law. This podcast demonstrates why! There’s no desire to be edgy, or provocative, it’s just honest. Generally, Profs. Baude and Epps are great professors who break down cases simply — without popularizing anything, or *trying* to be entertaining — so well that it’s now my go-to rec for legal podcasts, dethroning another.
TsTgos via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/02/24
More reviews of Divided Argument
Dan and Will are refreshingly frank and their conversations are largely free from hyperbole and strawmen. Rather than regurgitate the same take as others using different words, they present new ideas or at least new ways of looking at the same idea rooted in their somewhat idiosyncratic...Read full review »
WCAS '11 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 02/13/22
Unbelievable stories on the latest episode. We need more about Will’s criminal past and Dan’s football ragers.
ZeeStro via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 06/25/21
Thank you both for just being normal. Just a normal logical show. The end is not nigh. Thank you, Me
Jeffrey DC via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 06/26/22
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.