“When I listened to the podcast I thought that Amy and Adam would present a balanced view. If you want to listen to one person who wants to believe one side and not take into account any other view, then Amy is your person. There were times where it appeared to be more of an advocate for a guilty person. She doesn’t want to remotely even consider that Gail is guilty. There is a witness statement that was provided at the original trial that summed up Gail’s guilt, only to have this witness recant the testimony. Many years later the witness gives an account like her original statement. Amy’s response? She thinks there is enough that was said to clear Gail. Well done Adam - two stars to you, none to Amy. Having someone claim innocence all their life doesn’t make them innocent. Two juries of her peers said she was guilty. Maybe she is.”
pdcooper219 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
10/17/18