To You One-Stars
Ignoring important pieces of evidence will bring you to a pre-determined result. It's called the fallacy of circular reasoning, which all your comments employ (as well as ad hominem fallacies). You assume evolution and naturalism, so you interpret the evidence in strange ways to make it point to Darwinistic evolution. But in the end you have a "puzzle" with pieces shoved in where they don't fit. You still can't explained which came first... DNA, or proteins, for they recreate each other, and if you still are saying RNA, you've only skipped a few steps, RNA still requires a factory-like system of proteins to use RNA to make more proteins. Approach this problem without your naturalistic bias and see whether it points to the necessity of a designer or not. Approach all problems without naturalistic bias for that matter. Stop the circular reasoning.Read full review »
omegaready via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 09/03/06
More reviews of Intelligent Design the Future
If ID is placed amongst religious pod casts then it can be called religious becasue ...it is in the religion section! It refreshing to do scientific research and find both sides of Darwinism in the same area.
residential scholar via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 10/11/08
This is not science, nor is it in any way legitimate. I would rate this lower than 1 star if it were possible. It is just religious fundamentalist propaganda. Do yourself a favour and stay away.
GO LEAFS GO via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 11/30/08
A timely and well needed “podcast” that will foster dialogue and knowledge of what a large portion of the American public believe. I have many political, philosophical and scientific “blurbs” on my I-Pod, and this new addition to the scientific/philosophical debate by the many fine doctorate...Read full review »
SeanG via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/16/06
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.