Dingbats trying to justify their belief in a higher power
I've listened to all of their available podcasts and the common theme of all of their discussions is the irreducable complexity argument and god of the gaps argument wrapped up as science. Essentially they are saying that they can't imagine how the flagella or the eye could evolve so it must have been created by god (sorry - an intelligence). They stop short of calling it god because then they would be ferretted out as trying to push a theistic viewpoint into the schools. Their arguments are old and tired and have been refuted by many legitimate scientists. It's a fun listen if you want to understand how they think but this isn't real science.Read full review »
Mephistopheles via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/26/06
More reviews of Intelligent Design the Future
I cannot comprehend why this rubbish is under the science category. I don't see any ufology or astrology under science so this creationism-by-stealth doesn't belong here either.Read full review »
tjeales via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 05/07/07
I checked this out so that I could catch a few laughs at some out of context arguments by these religious "scientists" and found that their podcast is as short (<2 minutes) as their scientific viewpoint is shortsighted.Read full review »
Mr. ShortyPants via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/24/06
If someone is going out of their way to try and disprove an almost unanimously accepted theory then im not sure how they can get off calling it science. They claim that we belive certain things that we dont, and use incomplete logic and un credited scientists work as proof. If you dont want to...Read full review »
L-Player via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/23/08
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.