Inappropriate Classification
From the case of Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al., in the words of Judge John E. Jones III, of the US Federal Court: "we conclude that the religious nature of ID [intelligent design] would be readily apparent to an objective observer, adult or child" But not apparently obvious to ITunes. With respect, please move this podcast into religion and spiritualty category. Thank You.Read full review »
SciGuy66 via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 03/15/07
More reviews of Intelligent Design the Future
It is unclear why this podcast is listed in the Natural Sciences category as the arguments are not science based. Skip these podcasts if you are looking for a science based discussion. Listen to these podcasts if you want to learn the arguments of nonscientists.
gbroke via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 09/17/07
Interesting how the Discovery Institute hasn't yet done a show about its infamous 'wedge document'. I guess they want to deny their true fundamentalist creationsist motivations and internal dialouge while attempting to coopt the legitimacy of science. The wedge document was written...Read full review »
neutrinoguy via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/04/06
The production isn't great, but I'm giving it five stars anyway because this material is valuable. The religious dogma of evolution has little competition in the media and none in the classroom. It is secularist gospel. That being the case, it is excellent to hear the many, many flaws...Read full review »
Josh Hugo via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/31/07
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »