Inappropriate Classification
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“From the case of Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al., in the words of Judge John E. Jones III, of the US Federal Court:
"we conclude that the religious nature of ID [intelligent design] would be readily apparent to an objective observer, adult or child"
But not apparently obvious to ITunes. With respect, please move this podcast into religion and spiritualty category. Thank You.”Read full review »
SciGuy66 via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
03/15/07
More reviews of Intelligent Design the Future
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Come on! ID is not and never will be science, searching for evidence that may be construed as supporting a pre determined outcome can never be science. Please Apple, stop giving time and platforms to these people. The sad thing is that they are targetting the young and the non-science educated...”Read full review »
barx63 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
10/10/07
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“How did this podcast sneak into the science section? Intelligent Design has the same relationship to biology as Astrology has to Astronomy. Please move it to the religion category.”
Bookseller via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
01/18/08
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I see that the reaction to this podcast is overwhelmingly negative. I'll take that as a sign that it must make some good points to the affirmation of God as creator of this world.”Read full review »
Shunt 1 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/15/08
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
