Same old Same old
Jonathan Wells shows once again that ID is unwilling to learn from its mistakes. Yes, many phyla seem to appear out of nowhere in a 50-100 million period of time, called the Cambrian explosion and yet, both fossil and other evidence shows clearly how these phyla connect to pre-cambrian times. Of course, fossil record is scarce and yet recent findings, mostly in China, are connecting the dots and contrary to what ID wants you to believe, the fossil record strongly supports descent with modification. The upside down nature of the tree of life is a common misrepresentation by creationists. For instance, they take the fallacious position that the tree is upside down: first phyla and finally species. What they do not realize is that this is an inevitable outcome of Linnean classification. After all every species belongs to a phyla and thus a the higher categories have to arise simultaneous with the first species. And remember that ID remains fully without ANY answers as to how to explain these data. No pathways, no methods, no evidence nothing. ID revels in ignorance and as such has caused itself to remain scientifically vacuous.
Pimothy via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/30/06
More reviews of Intelligent Design the Future
If someone is going out of their way to try and disprove an almost unanimously accepted theory then im not sure how they can get off calling it science. They claim that we belive certain things that we dont, and use incomplete logic and un credited scientists work as proof. If you dont want to...Read full review »
L-Player via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/23/08
I checked this out so that I could catch a few laughs at some out of context arguments by these religious "scientists" and found that their podcast is as short (<2 minutes) as their scientific viewpoint is shortsighted.Read full review »
Mr. ShortyPants via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/24/06
I though I would give this show a try and see what there was to it. I was dismayed by the lack of evidence; real evidence, not just reasoning from pre-conceived notions. They praise using inductive reasoning, but have no evidence from actual experiements to back it up. Face it, ID is...Read full review »
Phil Zitzelman via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 09/20/07
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.