Awful. No Factual Science Involved.
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I though I would give this show a try and see what there was to it. I was dismayed by the lack of evidence; real evidence, not just reasoning from pre-conceived notions. They praise using inductive reasoning, but have no evidence from actual experiements to back it up. Face it, ID is creationism in a new guise.
And for the record, there are no such things as "Darwinists." This podcast uses the term darwinist as as if it were some insult that should offend those who believe in evolution. Discovery Institute, those of us who accept evolution aren't "Darwinists," we are realists that look act factual evidence, expereimental data, and have learned to accept the facts.”Read full review »
Phil Zitzelman via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
09/20/07
More reviews of Intelligent Design the Future
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This podcast is interesting just to see how much misinformation can be spread in the US, but as a science podcast it is just sad. Maybe the podcasters need to look up the defenitions of science, theory, fact, hypothesis, faith etc... cause they got it all wrong.
The podcast is also in the wrong...”Read full review »
Jay Eye via Apple Podcasts ·
Sweden ·
04/13/08
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Congratulations on the launching of your informative podcast!
It's obvious that ID will take hold of our thinking in the future, due to the irreducible complexity of superstition!”Read full review »
Dimitri Bright via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/12/06
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This is not a science podcast, why is it listed as one?”
Gramsci via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
07/09/07
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
