“This is as comprehensive as it gets in terms of the narrative of witness statements collected by the Warren Commission and House Committees. You can be forgiven for thinking that the WC opted for a simple narrative - Oswald did it, case closed - just because the alternative was significantly more uncomfortable. Taking the perspective of a jury member and listening to all the witness statements it’s not clear that the WC narrative is an open and shut case certainly not one beyond reasonable doubt. This is the benefit of the podcast. It presents evidence collected and leaves it to the listener to interpret.
Personally, I would like to see a few episodes about the Chicago assassination plan in October 1963 that went awry. This is key evidence of persons (not Oswald) seeking to assassinate JFK and in at least one respect fatally undermines the idea of a lone gunman in Dallas who just decides to take out a President on a particular day, and instead suggests a conspiracy of some sort.”
CassiusJP via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
02/25/23