In this powerful episode of Justice Unmasked: Family Court Corruption, Meg and The Real JD tackle the harrowing story of Maya and Sebastian Laing. These two brave teens were forcibly removed from their home and sent to a reunification camp in a traumatic, court-ordered intervention that has shocked the nation. With gut-wrenching footage showing their desperate pleas for help, Maya and Sebastian’s story has ignited public outrage and demands for systemic change in family court practices.Meg an...

In this powerful episode of Justice Unmasked: Family Court Corruption, Meg and JD dive deep into the harrowing yet inspiring story of Kikki Boinski. From enduring years of domestic violence to navigating the family court system, Kikki’s journey sheds light on the challenges survivors face when the legal system fails to protect them.Kikki’s story is one of resilience: escaping abuse, battling for her children, and rebuilding her life while confronting devastating health diagnoses. Her experien...

Justice Unmasked: Family Court Corruption is hosted by Meghann and co-host Michael, who together delve into the untold stories of family court injustices, revealing how power and manipulation can devastate lives. In this eye-opening podcast, Meghann and Michael confront the uncomfortable realities behind family court decisions, exploring how a system intended to protect can sometimes harm the very people it’s supposed to serve.In today’s episode, “Lindsey’s Story: A Mother’s Fight Against a C...

In this gripping episode of Justice Unmasked: Family Court Corruption, we dive into the case of Saundra Lea Marcoot, a mother whose fierce custody battle escalated into alarming allegations of retaliation against District Judge Jason Cashon. Recently indicted by a grand jury on charges of 'Obstruction or Retaliation,' Marcoot is accused of threatening to bypass security to assault the judge, a move that has raised significant concerns about safety for those involved in her case.Court and law ...

What happens when the legal system designed to protect families is instead used to tear them apart? In this gripping episode of Justice Unmasked: Family Court Corruption, we unravel the complex legal battle of Laura Smith, a mother from Denton County, Texas, who is fighting to clear her name and reclaim her rights. Representing herself in court, Laura faces a web of accusations, false evidence, and what she believes is a deliberate misuse of protective orders—all of which have disrupted her l...

Filing a motion in family court can be an intimidating process, but it doesn't have to be. In this episode of Navigating Family Court: A Step-by-Step Guide to Filing a Motion, we break down the essentials of filing a motion, providing a clear, step-by-step guide to help you navigate the complexities of family law. Whether you're seeking child custody arrangements, changes to child support, or modifications to existing orders, understanding how to effectively present your case is crucial.We’ll...

Family courts are supposed to protect children, but what happens when they tear families apart based on false accusations? In this deeply emotional episode of Separated Without a Voice: A Mother’s Heartbreaking Fight Against False Accusations and Family Court Bias, we share the heartbreaking story of Elena Ward, a mother from Johnson County, Kansas, who has been separated from her five children for over 260 days. Despite doing everything she could to comply with court orders, Elena was never ...

In this explosive episode of Justice Unmasked: Family Court Corruption, we dive into the serious allegations brought against Guardian ad Litem, Victor Langston, by petitioner Elena Ward (Case No. 17CV3057). Ms. Ward's formal complaint paints a troubling picture of bias, misrepresentation, and a failure to fulfill his legal duties as a child advocate under Kansas law.From claims of preferential treatment towards her ex-husband to the lack of investigation into allegations of abuse and parental...

n this episode of Fight for Fairness: The Legal Battle of Stacy Lynn Dimarco, we explore the complex legal battle in the case of Stacy Lynn Dimarco (also known as Stacy Lynn Jones) vs. The State of Oklahoma (Case No. F-2024-37). Stacy Lynn Dimarco appeals her convictions for violating a child custody order and obstructing an officer, presenting three primary arguments: insufficient evidence, double punishment, and a potential Brady violation.We break down each side’s arguments, including Ms. ...

Dive deep into the controversial and complex world of parental alienation within custody disputes in this compelling podcast. "Unmasking Parental Alienation" offers a comprehensive analysis, featuring insights from the Conscious Co-Parenting Institute (CCPI), the groundbreaking work of Dr. Craig Childress, and a critical examination of the expertise in family court cases.Listeners will explore CCPI's Custody Resolution Method, which utilizes data analysis to identify patterns within family co...

In this episode of Appeal Dismissal Errors & Alleged Court Violations: The Agnes Mecurry & Etha Jones Case, we delve into the recent legal developments surrounding the appeal dismissal of Agnes Mecurry and Etha Jones (Case No. 24-5786). The appellants argue that their appeal was wrongfully dismissed due to an oversight in court procedures, specifically pointing to violations of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(A)(v). We explore the key elements of their case, including claim...

In this episode of Behind the Bench, we take a deep dive into the troubling complaints filed against Guardian Ad Litem Bradly Wagner and Judge David Steel, both key figures in Johnson County, Kansas' family court. Christina Wheeler, a mother from Gardner, Kansas, shares her harrowing experience battling systemic bias and alleged misconduct in her prolonged custody battle.We explore claims of bias, neglect of professional duties, and disregard for crucial evidence, all of which have had a sign...

Dive deep into the backbone of American justice with this enlightening episode, where we explore the intricate workings of the U.S. Federal Court System. From the ground up, learn about the three-tiered structure of trial, appellate, and Supreme courts that keep the scales of justice balanced. We'll dissect how federal courts operate under limited jurisdiction, contrasting sharply with state courts, and delve into the critical roles and ethical standards of federal judges. Understand the meti...

In this gripping episode of our podcast, we delve deep into the harrowing story of Daisy, a four-year-old girl failed by the very institutions meant to protect her. Facing grave injustices and overlooked by New Jersey’s Division of Child Protection and Permanency, Daisy's plight exposes a systemic failure at every level. Join us as we uncover how misrepresented truths and ignored evidence led to a child being placed back into the arms of her alleged abusers. With expert interviews and a call ...

Dive into the complex intersection of federal and family court jurisdictions in "Federal vs. Family Court: Tara Smith's Jurisdictional Struggle." This episode takes a closer look at Tara Smith's contentious case against Baltimore County, Maryland, et al., heard in the District of Maryland. Focusing on the pressing issues of federal court abstention and jurisdiction in child custody disputes, we unpack how the Rooker-Feldman doctrine influences Tara's legal challenges. Our expert panel discuss...

In this gripping episode, we delve into the complex and emotionally charged case of Matthew Escalante, a father whose relentless legal battle against the Kansas family court system has inadvertently highlighted critical issues in both state and federal judicial processes. Through a series of federal court filings, Escalante's story reveals the desperation of a parent fighting for his children, the limitations of federal oversight in family law matters, and the fine line between seeking justic...

In this critical episode of our legal podcast, we explore the limitations of federal habeas corpus in child custody disputes and why this underscores the pressing need for comprehensive family court reform. We'll dive into two eye-opening cases - Montemayor v. Dallas County Child Protective Services and Vosburgh v. Berger - that reveal how the current legal system can leave parents without recourse in federal courts when fighting for their children. We'll break down the complex legal principl...

In this eye-opening episode of our legal podcast, we delve into two compelling cases from the United States District Court in Massachusetts that starkly illustrate the urgent need for family court reform. The Shalders and Perez cases serve as powerful examples of how the current system can fail families, pitting parental rights against government intervention in ways that often leave everyone worse off. We'll dissect these cases to expose the systemic flaws, from overzealous state agenc...

Echoes of Silence: A Struggle for Justice" is a compelling podcast that delves into the profound challenges individuals face when their pleas for help go unheard. Each episode reveals the disturbing reality of individuals fighting against a system that often fails to listen. We examine the distressing impact of stalking, harassment, and false accusations through detailed narratives, bringing to light the emotional and legal battles that ensue when trying to protect oneself and one’s children....

Join us on "Justice Unheard: A Mother's Battle in Family Court," a gripping podcast series that dives deep into the heart-wrenching stories of parents navigating the complex and often controversial world of family court. Each episode uncovers real-life cases, like that of Whitney Thompson, who fought valiantly to protect her children from an environment she deemed unsafe. We explore the critical decisions, the overlooked details, and the emotional toll on families caught in the legal labyrint...

In this gripping episode of "Bench Bias," we delve into a controversial family court case that has sparked intense debate over alleged judicial bias, due process violations, and the disregard of substantial evidence. The case involves a mother's struggle to reclaim her parental rights and seek justice through a Writ of Mandamus. Join us as we unpack the arguments, explore the impacts of bias against pro se representation, and dissect the implications of disregarding critical evidence and pare...