Extremely one-sided
Should’ve guessed since the podcast is named Karen the story would be titled in her favor, but it’s almost comically biased. As a previous rater noted, it misinterprets events and only gives credence to defense strategies. During voir dire for the second trial, potential jurors should be asked if they listened to this podcast and stricken if so.
BigCat415 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/28/24
More reviews of Karen
As other reviewers have noted, this podcast feels one-sided. But for anyone who’s done even a modicum of research into this case (e.g. just watched the trial), it’s so much worse than that. The host often says things as though they are obvious, when the clips played to support the assertions...Read full review »
K_X_H via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/31/24
Check out “the prosecutors” for a real “in-depth” analysis. They have done a multi series investigation and analysis of the trial, and all the controversy that surrounds this case. There are so many conspiracies.! They acknowledge the conspiracies, and break it all down.
workitmama007 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/25/24
Boring and hard to listen to
<D.B> via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/28/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.