“I find scoring this podcast difficult. I really like the presenter, Jim Harold. His style is very good, easy to listen to, and he seems quite likeable (He reminds me of D J Grothe from the Point of Inquiry podcast). The podcast is well produced and the interviews are just about the right length. Unfortunately, the default position is belief in whatever the subject matter happens to be, which for an 'open minded' podcast isn't such a good thing. For me, I'd like to see more of a Devil's Advocate approach, at least once in a while. This level of credulity suggests to me that it may have been categorised in the wrong place - Science it ain't. Still, I'll probably carry on subscribing and playing spot-the-logical-fallacy! 4/5 for the quality, 0/5 for the credulity.”Read full review »
John Wakefield via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
10/11/08