Interesting but slanted
I have found the spread across history of politics interesting. It has helped me to look into historical events I didn’t know about. However I have been very disappointed about the comments that Richard and Kate have made about current events and ideologies. They have been very slanted, treating left-leaning opinions as facts. There were certain historical episodes where they did a great job of explaining how certain facts were known (ie “so-and-so wrote in a letter...”) but there were also some times where opinions and feelings of parties involved were assumed based on today’s popular ideologies and stated as if they were obvious. I would still recommend a listen because I learned a lot, but I also took most of what I heard with a grain of salt. UPDATE: Earlier on I enjoyed it more, but I couldn’t even listed to the whole Clinton episode because they were defending the President while vilifying the people who were investigating him. I stopped listening at the point because their bias was so obvious I could no longer trust their research. 😞 I so enjoyed the beginning of this podcast, I was very disappointed by their later episodes!
How are all the names taken?10 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 11/10/20
More reviews of Political Scandals
Each podcast is well researched for accuracy and presented with a balance of consideration for each side in the scandal.
Yames296 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/12/20
The best part is the brief introduction and the voiceovers! Not to mention the NPR like voices that are calming. Informative!
realBenHayen via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 11/14/19
Preachy and slanted. That’s easy for them because hosts don’t have to handle any opposition
plisas via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/21/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »