Reviews his own debates - pathetic
Craig's auto-review of his debate against Hitchens is not unlike an assault victum awaking from a coma and recalling only a fine day at Disney Land. Aside from Craig's selective memory, it seems that explaining why you won a debate after the debate is rather gratiuitous and redundant. If you won the debate then it should be clear to most people watching the debate. Why not give us a link? Hitchens sure as hell never went on a podcast after a debate to explain why he won; he explained that in the debate.Read full review »
jemby5 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/05/12
More reviews of Reasonable Faith Podcast
Really poorly done refutation of atheist and secular aguments against the value of faith. The arguments tend to reference conversations had with atheists rather than actually play the conversations. The arguments are made primarily from a middle school level reactionary perspective and do not...Read full review »
skegurinn via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/20/12
You seem pretty arrogant in what u're saying too Gregor. Just like if i ask you, why is there a good idea to believe that the earth revolves around the sun, you'll point me to the teacher who first taught you that. Could you have figured it out on your own? Maybe, but most likely not....Read full review »
Evanation via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 06/08/11
William Lane Craig has some of the best philosphical apologetics I've seen. However, I do not agree with his theology as I am more of the Episcopal school of thought. Especially with my opinions of Homosexuality, and discern of the political religious "right". I also believe that he...Read full review »
Simmsman via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/21/10
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.