Reviews his own debates - pathetic
Craig's auto-review of his debate against Hitchens is not unlike an assault victum awaking from a coma and recalling only a fine day at Disney Land. Aside from Craig's selective memory, it seems that explaining why you won a debate after the debate is rather gratiuitous and redundant. If you won the debate then it should be clear to most people watching the debate. Why not give us a link? Hitchens sure as hell never went on a podcast after a debate to explain why he won; he explained that in the debate.Read full review »
jemby5 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/05/12
More reviews of Reasonable Faith Podcast
The Reasonable Faith podcast is a great resource for all interested in Christian Apologetics. It is primarily meant for a Christian audience but due to it's high quality content is accessible to I think pretty much anyone with a genuine interest. Brilliant.Read full review »
kt419 via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 11/22/11
I've read a lot of reviews criticizing the podcasts for lack of substance - for example: referencing debates rather than playing them; referring to arguments rather than argue them; etc. These podcasts are not meant to be primary source material! Read Dr. Craig's published work, watch...Read full review »
swisherboy19 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/04/13
I would like to urge people to learn a bit more about william lane Craig. He comes across as intelligent and his thoughts seem almost believable, but when you examine his so called facts, you see that he is deliberately lying. Please look into his affiliation with the discovery institute, and the...Read full review »
kirstywhoo via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 07/18/12
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »