Non-balanced journalism
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I have been a regular listener for a couple of years. Initially, I enjoyed the shows. However, over time, I noticed that the journalism was becoming unbalanced. The journalists would state a hypothesis and then set out to prove that hypothesis by interviewing only those who supported the narrative. On the rare occasion that they did seek a counter view, it was usually denigrated.
I don’t want propaganda. I want balanced journalism that allows me, as a thinking person to make up my own mind on an issue. I don’t want to be steered in a direction by the presenter’s ideological position, even if I agree with that position.
Accordingly, I have unsubscribed from The Detail.”
Massimillianonz via Apple Podcasts ·
New Zealand ·
05/24/22
More reviews of The Detail
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Balanced, intelligent, insightful. Impartial and a little anarchic. They don’t let the story get in the way of a good truth.”
Middleaged Learner via Apple Podcasts ·
New Zealand ·
01/02/21
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Good content and enjoyable to listen to”
boyarns via Apple Podcasts ·
New Zealand ·
05/25/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“At 20ish minutes long, this is the perfect podcast to listen to on an early morning walk. Contemporary and varied subjects, with experts featured, give credibility to the show.”
Tallpoppy65 via Apple Podcasts ·
New Zealand ·
04/12/21
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
