“The lack of an opposite social scientist of psychologist on your episode regarding so called ‘implicit bias’ and pushing Marxist propaganda of ‘privilege’ is not science. An open conversation between two sides of this would have been more beneficial for the listeners to understand this woman’s own clear CONSCIOUS bias.
Anecdotal evidence and ‘my own studies err surveys’ is not at all, peer reviewed and ethical board passed research with reviewed and considered methodologies.
Nor was this episode backed up with any sort of actual, published peer reviewed objective analytical points of reference for the listeners to cross reference themselves.
Really rather disappointing considering that the magazine is so well considered.
Easy way to control those who will not question the fact that the unconscious can not be measured or assessed in the psychological realm of research.
Really really disappointing. I give two stars, however, because it is a podcast overall that is open to discussing a variation of viewpoints which I wholeheartedly believe in and support. My star rating may change in the future if the producers start to incorporate a fuller picture in each episodes.”
new podia via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
06/15/20