Changes not for the better.
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I have changed my review from 5 to 2 stars because of two unfortunate changes. Rather than interviewing the authors of original papers, the host frequently just interviews another Science reporter. This produces a “scripted” effect and the enthusiasm of the real scientist-authors is missing. The podcast has also become very heavily committed to the current “woke” fashion, further reducing scientific content and approach. Really disappointing.”
The Devonian Kid via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/19/22
More reviews of Science Magazine Podcast
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I love this podcast because you guys, along with "Nature" help me stay updated on new and interesting information!”Read full review »
KarmaLee1235678975445775467 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/07/17
“The information provided by this podcast is on par with most of the other science podcasts available. However, the terrible music and monotonous host make this podcast difficult to enjoy.”
rabbitt92 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/19/11
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The problem with thalidomide is that there are two forms, left and right chirality and one form is fine and therapeutic and the other is mutagenic. When mass production began there was little understanding of the difference. Not describing this difference when discussing this drug is irresponsible.”
etherdog via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/18/22
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
