Good Concept, Poor Reporting
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The reporting on health issues (Paleo Diet, Sugar) are just perpetuating poor dietary pseudoscience and not challenging listeners to rethink what they're eating. She's comparing country dietary guidelines to compare what's "healthy" and totally missing the mark. Guests are so biased and make overarching statements, which the host continues to stretch conclusions. The actually accurate, helpful guests are basically dismissed by the reporter. I thought this would be a fun podcast to listen to, but with such biased stances, I won't continue to listen. A shame, as the reporter is pleasing to listen to, but the content is a no-go.”Read full review »
california970 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/03/16
More reviews of Science Vs
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Speaking as a scientist, I am impressed - a good treatment of complex topics. How rigorous can you get in a 15 minute podcast? Well, pretty darn rigorous…”
272app via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/18/15
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“For a show that is supposed to focus on science this has way too much bias in the tone and presentation. Its really obvious that the host is on a warpath with each issue. Just couldn't handle it.”Read full review »
Dan_______________ via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/01/16
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I like the concept but the execution is not the best. The podcasters bias appears in a couple of the more controversial episodes. Minimizes facts in certain episodes that don't agree with their agenda and will use opionions from their experts and portray them as factul. The ones that were...”Read full review »
Egdtkcdukxrik via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/09/15
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
