“This podcast makes it pretty clear from the first episode that it’s biased against the victim/survivor, offering very one sided evidence and using compelling language to cast thin doubt against the evidence shared in the podcast.
The author is more interested in having listeners question what wasn’t shared in court, than in portraying the case against the convicted criminals.
The author also recycles content from his own satanic panic research to draw a very tenuous connection between false recovered memories and the experience of the victim/survivor in coming forward with the support of mental health professionals after years of remaining silent - circumstances that a lot of survivors find themselves in. Such are the crimes.
Finally, the ads are repetitive and annoying, especially the whispery University one.”
sophtastico via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
01/09/24