One sided, disorganised, disappointing.
This podcast makes it pretty clear from the first episode that it’s biased against the victim/survivor, offering very one sided evidence and using compelling language to cast thin doubt against the evidence shared in the podcast. The author is more interested in having listeners question what wasn’t shared in court, than in portraying the case against the convicted criminals. The author also recycles content from his own satanic panic research to draw a very tenuous connection between false recovered memories and the experience of the victim/survivor in coming forward with the support of mental health professionals after years of remaining silent - circumstances that a lot of survivors find themselves in. Such are the crimes. Finally, the ads are repetitive and annoying, especially the whispery University one.
sophtastico via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 01/09/24
More reviews of Shadow of Doubt
Only ever had the 1st episode with this podcast- the episodes just error all of the time
chrissior via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 04/17/23
What does this journalist wish to gain by approaching this case this way? If it is to expose a miscarriage of justice wouldn’t you deconstruct the legal evidence and court case, privacy requirements notwithstanding? Instead this victim blamer goes about criticising psychiatric and sexual assault...Read full review »
mellly-Q via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 05/12/23
Incredibly one sided podcast that makes a mockery out of our justice system and invalidates this poor young woman’s awful experience. Production quality is poor with the audio barely understandable in episode 1 and multiple glitches, making it even harder to listen to. Not the Australians usual...Read full review »
Baldling via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 04/28/23
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.