Dana is a great host.
She speaks clearly, introduces her guests, and remembers the names of the films. As a critic, she's average. Her real failure is as a journalist. She is unable to record what is presented and report it accurately. Often her recollection is stunningly dissimilar to the film. Not on points open to interpretation. Not on questions of style. Basic plot points. So do listen if you enjoy saying, "what?!" "what?!" aloud.Read full review »
Indyca via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/03/13
More reviews of Slate's Spoiler Specials
I will second many other commenters on two points that motivate my fairly negative review. Dana Stevens frequently criticizes some aspect of a film because she doesn't understand something that was quite clear. I am not talking obscure details. Major plot points create confusion. Also, the...Read full review »
Mpb1267 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 11/04/12
I like the idea of Dana (the host) having different co-hosts with specific knowledge on the film. I like that Dana has a lot of traditional film knowledge. 20-30 minutes is a good length. Of all the Slate podcasts (I listen to quite a few) this one has the most technical problems, but, hey,...Read full review »
jonahofthesea via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/11/13
I have listened to most of these podcasts and have always found Dana Stevens to be an engaging and interesting host--while still wondering what the point of spoiling a movie is when most listeners of this podcast have likely seen the movie and would be better suited by more analysis of scenes not...Read full review »
imalwaysright via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 02/10/12
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.