Your are not credible
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Was hoping to get some ‘real’ and ‘unbiased ‘ commentary regarding the Supreme Court but in the first 5 minutes of your show your proved that you are not knowledgeable - your analysis of Kamala Harris’ ascension as the Democrat presidential nominee is entirely flawed and it is a big deal despite your representation otherwise. You fail to acknowledge that Joe Biden received approximately 14 million votes as the democratic candidate. Harris received zero. That is very ‘undemocratic’ and definitely not the voice of the people as you say. You cannot just swap out a candidate because the convention was not held yet.
Obviously cannot continue listening as I know it will be filled with more nonsense and failed analysis.”
Chris. L. G. via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
09/13/24
More reviews of Strict Scrutiny
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Some of the brightest minds of the legal academy analyzing all things SCOTUS”
CareyHughes via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/24/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Great content and explanation but I do have to mention the vocal fray is excessive irritating at times.”
1234inform via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
09/08/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Fun and informative podcast. You'll learn, but it's not so dry that you'll zone out. Good way to keep up with the goings on at the Court. It's left leaning, but that's kind of the point. Why not get both sides of an issue? I listen to this and the Heritage Foundation's...”Read full review »
hbd5035 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/23/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
