Already overly biased
Well, it ain’t the next First Mondays. I enjoy getting some liberal commentary on the Court, but it’d be nice if there were *some* semblance of balance on this podcast (or at least not open contempt for the conservative viewpoint). These people pride themselves on offering something different (mostly highlighting the fact the commentators are women) but they don’t seem to care about intellectual diversity at all. Newsflash: I’m here for smart legal commentary—I don’t care who it comes from, I just want to hear interesting ideas. Focus more on the content (like bringing in some balance/objectivity) and not on virtue-signaling aesthetics. I do like the goal of limiting legalese and making the law more accessible to non-practitioners. Hopefully this podcast turns it around. Best of luck.
Jonesin 4 entertainment via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/08/19
More reviews of Strict Scrutiny
Scholarly, accessible and entertaining podcast offering valuable academic insights into the workings of the US Supreme Court.
JSF Lee via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 10/18/19
If you want to know how left-wing “intellectuals” think about the law, or are a left-wing intellectual that just wants to hear other people affirm your own narrow-minded view of the world, this is the podcast for you! If, on the other hand, you want good faith analysis of case that are currently...Read full review »
jaxemer11 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 11/13/20
Ugh, I wanted to like it, but it’s way too heavy handed and outrage mongerish. It’s like they just pash around the grand stand for an hour and a half and call it good.
AmyH145 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/02/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »