Already overly biased
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Well, it ain’t the next First Mondays. I enjoy getting some liberal commentary on the Court, but it’d be nice if there were *some* semblance of balance on this podcast (or at least not open contempt for the conservative viewpoint). These people pride themselves on offering something different (mostly highlighting the fact the commentators are women) but they don’t seem to care about intellectual diversity at all. Newsflash: I’m here for smart legal commentary—I don’t care who it comes from, I just want to hear interesting ideas. Focus more on the content (like bringing in some balance/objectivity) and not on virtue-signaling aesthetics. I do like the goal of limiting legalese and making the law more accessible to non-practitioners. Hopefully this podcast turns it around. Best of luck.”
Jonesin 4 entertainment via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/08/19
More reviews of Strict Scrutiny
“Wildly partisan.”
MarkBowen303 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/01/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I enjoy this podcast very much but Kate Shaw speaks far too quickly. These are important topics that need time to stew. Please slow down!!!!”
S.T.L.2020 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/17/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Jaime and Leah are two of my favorite legal tweeters so I can’t wait for weekly podcasts from them during the next SCOTUS term. First EP didn’t disappoint!!”
sweat shorts via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/04/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
