Former fan, maybe a fan in the future
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I usually like this show so long as I skip the first five minutes or so but Harry’s decision to air Charlie (Biden is too old) Sykes and Andrea (what is she actually good at) Mitchell on July 1, Monday after debate 1 for
“It was a cataclysm of a week that left most of us reeling and in acute need of the most thoughtful and savvy analysts to put it in perspective and help think about what’s next.”
Is baffling. Thoughtful and savvy analysis from these two, ha 🤣🤣🤣, good one! Except that it’s not good.
Every time in the modern era where a party incumbent has faced a primary challenge or has stepped aside, the other party has won.
Every time.
Knowingly or unknowingly, Charlie and everyone spewing the same stuff as Charlie eg Tim Miller, is advocating for DJT, the felon, rapist and fraudster to win.”
rollamichael via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/01/24
More reviews of Talking Feds
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“And looking forward to much more! My only complaint is that I would love a full hour! (Or more!) Thank you!”
Sophie Majeski via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/17/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“keep up the great work!”
gobeavs via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/15/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“If you want truth, competence and excellent interpretation of the law without bias this is your place! Thank you to all of you who are working so hard to get the truth to the American people! Please hang in there; we need you!”
Sandra👏 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/29/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
