“It’s clear that the board already had fully-formed opinions about the candidates before most of them even stepped into the room. I enjoyed this podcast series at first, but I found myself growing increasingly frustrated by the personal biases of the interviewers, especially in the Buttigieg and Steyer interviews. The parts about Buttiegeg being on the frontlines of corporate price-fixing, corporate downsizing, war, etc. hardly even felt like questions, and seemed more designed to sway listeners than to dig for information—especially in contrast to many of the questions that the board’s seemingly more preferred candidates got.”
JAkeR522 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/30/20