Reviews
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Bad enough that we have a reality show president. Now we have a reality show newspaper. A sad day for those of us who used to take the New York Times seriously. ***just listened to the first deliberations episode, and I now see the value of this inside look at the nut editorial staff—we can now...”Read full review »
bjohns383 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/28/21
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I listened to Sen Warren’s interview , again . Following the Nevada dem senate, I’m changing my mind about Warren- for the better. Choice staff, bring Warren back. I see she has moderated her view on Medicare or at least a phase in which most people don’t understand. I hear a less radical leader...”Read full review »
Maek@J via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/21/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“A Libertarian candidate interviewed or examined would be very good”
boiledbeef5678 via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
02/17/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“People acting as if the editorial board is NYT news.
They’re people, they have opinions and want to endorse the candidate *they* think is good. That’s the point and has nothing to do with their news section.
Along those lines, these were very informing of things that don’t get asked a lot....”Read full review »
ashy.aspen via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/12/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The editorial board seemed more interested in catching the candidates off guard than having a substantive discussion”
bugaboo2971 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/11/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Their neoliberal agenda is clear. So take everything from NYT’s with a grain of salt. They are just as biased as Fox News.
The only reason I give them 4 stars is cuz i like Interview of Bernie- the juxtaposition of His authenticity and integrity with the passive-aggressive and disingenuous...”Read full review »
kokakoba via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/07/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The board shows a significant lack of understanding of where the American populace is politically and economically. Their observations, questions, and analysis make clear that they don’t understand why, or how, our current dumpster-fire-in-chief was elected.
If you want John Delaney’s hot takes...”Read full review »
Nsparksss via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/07/20
“If this is how interviews are normally conducted at the NYTimes, I may have to consider canceling my subscription. How is it good journalism to immediately put the candidate on the defensive the second the interview starts? They don’t post the whole interview but they do have time to overlay...”Read full review »
Cocobunny777 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/07/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Completely biased- and evident in the questions asked. I love the idea of this podcast and I think it holds so much potential. Instead I’m left disappointed. Like other reviewers mentioned, no endorsement was made. Doesn’t help that during the deliberation, they tend to talk over each other and I...”Read full review »
El220 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/05/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The panel comes across as very anti-Midwest, as well as elitist and condescending.”
wkendgranny via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/04/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This was so freaking pretentious. I’m still an undecided voter, but I did decide to never waste my time on another NYT podcast.”
Jennuhlex via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/04/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I want to see The NY Times release the full audio interviews in the future. If you are going to release a full transcript, why not release the full audio and let us judge for ourselves? Please do not underestimate your listeners capacity to understand long form discussion. I find it hard to bear...”Read full review »
a father 04931605395973279 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/03/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The interviews were somewhat useful, but in the end they didn’t ask great questions and there was a lot of bias. Also their lack of making a single choice of a candidate was a let down and very disappointing.”
MasterShake551 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/03/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“So Cons are: All of the liberal slow speak drove me absolutely crazy. “I love how........ the democrats........ offered so many........... just different options.....” Jeez, spit it out already.
Also, has there been a single endorsement that made it through to the presidency? It seems like The...”Read full review »
Buhrmmat via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/03/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“As much as I enjoy the NYT, this was really disappointing. At such a critical point in time for our country, I was expecting interviews and reviews that were neutral, encouraging the listeners to make their own decisions. Each reviewer’s bias and opinions were evident in the questions they asked...”Read full review »
sharpkp2 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/03/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Despite some clear biases in some of the interviews, the interviews gave me a better sense of the candidates and what they offer. I didn't find their discussions after each interview or their decision process particularly interesting or enlightening.”Read full review »
uwsela via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/31/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I’ve listened to all the episodes and thank the NYT for giving us the opportunity to hear the candidates in their own words. My 4-star rating reflects my wish that the complete and unedited audio of each interview had been provided.
One of the things I didn’t hear any of the candidates talk...”Read full review »
cjcjca via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/31/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“It was hard to listen to the interview with Joe Biden. The board was so hostile and biased. I could tell that the board doesn’t really like the moderate candidates based on their tones.”
Realmadridistarrr via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/31/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The interviews are great! The fact that they couldn’t make an actual endorsement is maddening. That was the job.”
anjelaj via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/31/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“It’s an endorsement. The interviews were fantastic, but come on. Do the years of political expertise on board mean nothing? There are better and worse answers to who should be president, truth exists. Should have picked one candidate.”
Jdkalcihwvakclor via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
01/31/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Thank you for vetting these candidates and sharing these interviews. Sometimes the questions were off-putting, but it gave me a chance to see how a candidate would react to tough questions; tough questions that will be mild compared to what they are going to face in a general election. Some of...”Read full review »
Novice runner in Oslo via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/31/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“It was refreshing to hear the candidates having a conversation with the panel (with varying degrees of spin) While I sometimes disagreed with the panel and their methods (are they rating on “electability”, ability, platform?), I came away with a better sense of the candidates. I have been ...”Read full review »
MargaretShlegel via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/30/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“It’s clear that the board already had fully-formed opinions about the candidates before most of them even stepped into the room. I enjoyed this podcast series at first, but I found myself growing increasingly frustrated by the personal biases of the interviewers, especially in the Buttigieg and...”Read full review »
JAkeR522 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/30/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The concept of the podcast is good, but the editorial board is underwhelming. The interview with Mayor Pete, by some board members was almost hostile- he was in his mid 20s during his McKinsey career and a number cruncher. Yet he was blamed for layoffs and an isolated price fixing incident of...”Read full review »
IrvineLarry via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/30/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I greatly appreciate The NY Times making these interviews available. They were very helpful in making a decision on who to support.
And, I wish they would publish their interview with Cory Booker. Even though he withdrew from the race, I have found him very engaging and would love to hear his...”Read full review »
Alan from Cape Cod via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/29/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Could not agree more with prior reviewers comment around the unnecessary attack and over simplified assumptions the times folks seemed to be making around the link between being employed at a company that is tied to some wrong doing /Mc kinsey...and how as just being employed there Mayor Pete is...”Read full review »
dep Ivanova via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/29/20
“I want to be clear here that my opinion is not based on resentment that “my candidate” was somehow treated badly; in fact, the candidate I support was endorsed... at least halfway. 😅 That being said, I was disappointed with the bias that shone through throughout the interviews, from blatantly...”Read full review »
ChelsieRL via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/29/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“In general, I found this podcast to be informative and interesting. At times, the questions posed to each candidate came across as superficial or simply an attempt to provoke pointless controversy. Still, I would recommend listening to gather even more information ahead of your state’s primary...”Read full review »
Ahoog69 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/29/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Canadian listener here. So surprised to hear high school style snickering about one of the candidates during your deliberations. Did not inspire confidence in your “thought” process.”
58prof via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
01/27/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Preface: I am not a Buttigieg supporter
The interview of Buttigieg was an embarrassment. The obsession with his time at McKinsey and the obvious lack of understanding of what junior consultants do was illuminating. As for Mr. Applebaum stating that Buttigieg was at the “front lines of corporate...”Read full review »
dreadedscotts via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/27/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I’m very interested in the policies/ proposals of all the candidates but I could live without the superior attitude of the interviewers. The thought that a young employee of a consulting firm should have had some control over the mission / corporate responsibility or that of the clients he’s...”Read full review »
Mekhm via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/27/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Thanks to the Times for its commitment take a different approach to the 2020 race. But please STOP 🤚the shameless endorsement ads for Mockingbird.”
Bill in Mission Hills via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/26/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Great interviews, excellent, well thought questions by journalists who know what they are talking about. What a great idea it is to also broadcast their assessment of the candidate. Well done, and make more podcasts like this!”
Marie C. Bruxelles via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/25/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I'm really grateful to have this! Election time can get so confusing and I feel like there's so much information out there. Nice to hear opinions and plans from the candidates themselves in this format.”Read full review »
CXWME via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/24/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Great podcast series to help the listener learn more about candidates and ultimately make a thoughtful decision for who you support in the primary and general elections.”
Opigirl via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/24/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Great in depth Answers and a chance to connect with candidates personalities.”
theeandthem via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
01/24/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“If you’re interested in memorizing the reviews of a Broadway play, this is the podcast for you! It’s unfortunate that a podcast that frames itself on a need for transparency is undercutting the message through their obvious monetization of the offering.”
Nofundone via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/24/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I think a conversation reveals so much more than a debate. That’s why this feels so important, intimate, and revealing. Couldn’t recommend this more for voters from the whole spectrum.”
Jabby el brujo via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/24/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This is exactly what I needed. With the sheer number of potential nominees and debates, it is hard to keep up with it all. This podcast does all the legwork for us- bringing all the most pressing issues and concerns to each interview. It’s also pretty interesting to get a peek into how they...”Read full review »
mckennd via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/24/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Just found this podcast and listened to the Sanders episode. I’m blown away. What is this garbage? Where are the researched, thoughtful questions you should be asking? And then you trash him on the follow up episode about something you didn’t even bring up to him in the episode and say that young...”Read full review »
jsp90123 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/24/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“These interviews are fantastic. I wish NYT Editorial had taken a firm final position on endorsement (agree w Ross on NYT The Argument) but the questions and answers are so much more substantive than the debates. One request, I think the NYT should break with the democratic organizers and...”Read full review »
jdfynds via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/23/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Feels like this panel is pretty biased but it’s hard to really blame them considering the echo chamber they are in. A fish doesn’t know it’s wet.”
Shambles Murphy via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/23/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I like getting the interviews in auditory form, rather than having to read the transcripts (also available). Thanks for doing this! Reading some of the other reviews here gives me some chills - not in a good way. Nobody's perfect. Please, can we tone down the hostility?”Read full review »
Lover of Podcasts via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/23/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“No offense, but the voters didn’t need to hear how the NYT endorsed the candidate we all knew they were going to endorse from the beginning: Elizabeth Warren (plus Amy Klobuchar for some reason, ultimately providing no real guidance).”
alv_rez via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/23/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The NYT is clueless. I thought this would be an interesting podcast - but, they clearly have their own agenda, and understand little to nothing about technology and how it is shaping the future. How would they? They are part of the dying breed. Buy any newspapers lately?”
BoulderAdonis via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/23/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“#Bernie2020”
the_burrito_milf via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
01/22/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I think the interviews I’ve heard so far were some of the most substantive and engaging conversations with the candidates I have yet heard. A friendly reminder that all of the Democratic candidates are a vast improvement over our current situation and very interesting for anyone curious about...”Read full review »
JoeGreen97 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/22/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“A great way to listen to the candidates in a format that isn't a stump, or trying to get sound bites”Read full review »
Schlockinz via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/22/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This is a joke. It makes all of the candidates look like a joke. Shame on the editorial board for their insane and unbalanced questions. I do not understand the reason to make a decision when no decision is ultimately made. Save your time and do your own research to learn more about each candidate.”
Gingertwerk via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/22/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
