Judgemental
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This is a case of “thanks boomer.” Lots of judgement of Jessica Mann. It is not very impartial. I might listen again in the hope it’s less judgemental. Maybe the hosts aren’t aware of coercive control.”
SawHole via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
02/05/20
More reviews of The Harvey Weinstein Trial
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“So disgusted to hear this so-called "unfiltered" replay of the trial peppered with the kind of judgemental criticism of victims' testimony that keeps women from coming forward in the first place. Comments such as "this is not the kind of language you would use", "it's...”Read full review »
Jane Doe #120567 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
01/30/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The work that must go into this is extraordinary. I'm sure Mr W. is a wiked man but I'm not covinced of rape yet. I will wait till the end. The motives of the accusers are questionable as is the methods of the prosecutor. I would not be surprised by a not guilty verdict. The good...”Read full review »
Pzimmy via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/03/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This is riveting! The hosts’ commentary is great and helpful, especially when they discuss what it was like in the actual courtroom. And, the re-enactments are incredible! Perfect acting and the whole podcast is a must-hear.”
A little input via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/05/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
