False information, biased
This podcast is biased from the first minute of episode one. Constantly stating things as fact when they are nothing but. No, patsy wasnt “ruled out” as writing the ransom note, no it was never “proven” that a stun gun was used, and it also wasn’t “proven” that the head injury came after the strangulation (many experts indicate otherwise). The constant finger pointing at police was boring - yes the crime scene was contaminated, but why is no one questioning why the Ramseys felt it necessary to call four of their friends to come over before the police were even there? If the Ramseys had cooperated, the police could have made a go at ruling them out in the first instance, rather than evading police, not answering questions, and giving them the run around. Pathetic.
Lucy Lambchop via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 03/27/24
More reviews of The Killing of JonBenet Ramsey
Are you kidding me with this?! This is why people hate true crime podcasters who don’t know what they’re doing!! I listened in the car on my sister’s phone and had to remember to come back on my phone just to write a review of this. Just skip it and read her Wikipedia, folks. It’s more accurate...Read full review »
KatB730 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/20/19
Lame. All the info in the first 2 episodes could have been covered in 1/2 of one episode. Most of the time is spent repeating the same comments from random “interviews” of nobody particularly relevant and shamelessly promoting the series itself. Don’t bother.
frank deangelo via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/29/19
The intro sounded promising, now a measly 27 min podcast ? This could have been great .
Ruby702 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/20/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »