“It’s easier to call bias then to admit you are wrong. When facts and evidence, or lack there of in this case, don’t fit with their irrational and uneducated narrative they attack the narrator. A man who is simply presenting all of the facts that can and have been proven. Every key person involved has been given equal opportunity to talk and present their case. The fact that some present better then others, when Dan is simply replaying actual conversations, is a reflection of the character of the person interviewed and not Dan himself. The fact that evidence the police have promised hasn’t been presented is not a reflection of bias on Dan’s part. It’s simply because it isn’t there to present. In my mind, the heart of the discourse surrounding this case, is emotional maturity and accepting the concept that it is possible to love, with your whole heart, body and soul, a child that is not biologically yours. It’s a sad fact that there is a portion of the population out there who have never experienced anything on any level of love. Who have grown up in less then ideal environments and because it’s all they’ve ever known, anything different or better is seen as being flash or fancy. Unrelatable and therefore scary and wrong. A general acceptance that this style of parenting and environment is ok because it was good enough for them. There is no capacity to envision a change or that there is even a need for one. I also rally at the all familiar cry that kids don’t just go missing. They don’t just get taken. Joanne Ratcliffe, Kirstie Gordon,, Renee Aitken, Daniel Morcombe, Samantha Knight, Beaumont children, Quinn’e Diec…. Dan has taken a risk in doing this podcast. Professionally and personally bridges have the potential to be burned. Selfishly I want to say keep up the good work as I recognise good journalism when I see it and I’m a fan of your work and podcasts. But mainly thank you.”
flowerrose267 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
11/11/24