This is not their real voice..
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I’m curious about this case. The story coupled with the presenters being journalists from the court room can often make for compelling updates. Such was the case with Claremont: The Trial. Whilst some updates from Court have been very interesting to hear, I do find it rather annoying that ahead of each individual read of a transcript we are reminded that “this is not their voice”. I understand the need for the statement, but I think it would be fair to make that point during the initial introduction and leave it at that. No need to remind us, especially when it can be within minutes of just each different reading.”
I-trance via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/04/24
More reviews of The Missing Campers Trial
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“What’s up with this. We have all been waiting and given 🍩
Surely you had a plan before starting this podcast?”
downesy1990 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
04/30/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I am loving this podcast and look forward to the next episode coming out. The reporters are both fantastic and so easy to listen to. It’s so interesting.”
Auatralia via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
05/25/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“And a March and May fools? Such a big story deserves a good podcast!! Not a NON podcast! Delete this and leave it for the pros to cover!!!”
annacerito via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
04/07/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
