Very biased
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I know this is the Daily Mail but surely even they would choose reporters who can at least pronounce common words properly. It’s so irritating to hear “graph” with a flat ‘a’ over and over.
I hope we get to hear more from professionals like professor Jane Hutton. Although they call it “addressing the doubters” rather than something like “asking the professionals”
The reporters have clearly already decided.”
Aldjdoueb via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
09/10/24
More reviews of The Trial of Lucy Letby
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Love the podcast and the new Lucy Letby actress is great, but I really miss the previous one now!!!”
mrandell66 via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
06/22/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“…unless you just want to hear the opinions of the presenters, which is very one sided and biased. I listened right up until the verdict last year and came back today, but listened to half an episode and back where we left off - just hope for the presenters sakes (and pride), Lucy Letby doesn’t...”Read full review »
rsa1992 via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
09/26/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The journalists seem either unable or unwilling to entertain the idea that Lucy Letby’s conviction is unsafe. They provide weak arguments for maintaining their position (I.e. that Lucy is guilty), and use deflection tactics to dismiss the valid concerns raised by statisticians and medical...”Read full review »
Isla1764 via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
09/06/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Patreon
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
