“Seems very biased towards the prosecution. There were some errors also and important parts of the trial were missed.
One of the voices was a little annoying (it’s a podcast - a radio voice is required).
Intro way too long and with presumptive statements chosen.
Short episodes, the last part of most episodes were interviews with various guests - would have preferred more detailed trial content (especially from defence).
Disparaging comments about those (experts and the general public) who had questioned the verdict after the 2nd trial.
Not sure what else I expected from a DM podcast/journalists.”
lisambloo via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
07/25/24