Is a bite mark expert next? Will that be a "match," too?
You absolutely must learn the basics before talking about forensic evidence. It's as if you're working to drag in every drop of discredited forensic nonsense -- either in fact or the way you're describing it -- from the last century, and it's incredibly harmful. I never criticize hosts in my reviews; I feel like there's too much harshness on here, perhaps because we depersonalize podcasters, but you're perpetuating the same nonsense we are constantly working against, even when the expert is literally telling you the opposite in the same clip. No, it's not a "match." He just said that. In your particular case -- at least through Episode 2 -- the genotype "can't be excluded." You don't even have a statistical probability. What finally made my head explode is when the Ohio expert said,"You can't call it a match in court," and the host immediately said, “They would call this a 'match' in court.'” NO. Even if you had hard probability estimates YOU DON'T CALL IT A MATCH. P.S. Blood spatter evidence is thoroughly discredited writ large, too. Just promise not to tell us about bite mark evidence next.Read full review »
therealtamishow via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/23/21
More reviews of The Yellow Car
That’s how much you got me hooked. And my heart hurts for this family. I want to know more. I’m starting my i on en podcast and want to do this story.
Ihatecarrots68 via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 09/20/21
Well done show, very sad and another example of terrible injustice. My heart broke listening to Pooneh and Pooya speak about their mother and father.
Mrs.RLS via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/18/21
Mike did it case closed. Go away
captain scott marinkovich via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 12/20/21
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »