Biased and not always correct
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I used to love this, like I love trashy divorces, until the Camilla episode. I felt the approach was biased and the so-called expert was more of a gossip peddler. The reason Philip could not become is because a king out ranks a queen and, as he married in to the family, the crown belongs to Elizabeth (just like Victoria and Albert), Camilla can be queen consort because she is married in and queen is under a king. Her official title is Queen consort, she is just referred to as queen for ease. The queen mother was also queen consort but referred to as just queen.”
elepj via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
06/29/23
More reviews of Trashy Royals
“I enjoy the informal style with nicknames etc, but Alicia in particular seems way more interested in “spiderwebs”, and “connections” than actual historical events. For example episode ostensibly about a real estate mogol instead was nothing but a list of the celebrities who visited her hotel....”Read full review »
Juliasayre via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/15/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I’m here for royal history - not Taylor Swift. It took me three tries to get through the weak lyrics of hers you spent wayyyyy too much time reciting.”
naskiddn via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/26/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“You people really talk like this? Why is everything dumbed down these days for the millennial crowd? Drunk history, Drunk Shakespeare? This is childish. I’ll stick to Not Just the Tudors, where information is presented intelligently.”
Apespecnet via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/17/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
