Investigation by 60 minutes
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This podcast isn’t bad because it deals with a controversial case. Please stop trying to attribute poor reviews to listeners taking offence.
The arguments being made by the host for this man’s innocence are incredibly weak and frustrating to listen to. It’s little wonder that this man is still in jail if this is the most convincing evidence available.
This podcast is reminiscent of a 60 minutes investigation.”
MillenialEsther via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/20/24
More reviews of Trial by Water
“He has been tried and convicted twice. How this is considered quality investigative journalism is beyond me.
Shame on you Channel 9/ and The Age”
gemmy73 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/13/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“He’s been found guilty twice of murdering his 3 children. This is not the Dawson case. You’re not a hero. Having a colleague as an opposing sounding board is a lame attempt of balancing it up. The pain this podcast will be causing is horrific.”
_FCH_ via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/22/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Needs more of a balanced view - did his defense team co author this?”
Matlock2010 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/15/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
