Biased interpretation of selective evidence
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The podcast doesn’t really live up to the premise at all - that an innocent man has been put in jail. The evidence presented in the podcast is very selective and interpreted in a way that doesn’t even provide any compelling reason why the judgment should be disturbed.
Quite tellingly, it starts by outlining that it was the defence lawyer who got in touch with the journalist to raise these issues. It seems like the journalist has bought the defence lawyer’s tale hook, line and sinker and is using the podcast as a way to build public support for it. Biased much?”
biting_mammal via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
08/28/24
More reviews of Trial by Water
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Difficult to listen to this after all the heartache of this case. How about the possibility that the justice system got it exactly right and this ‘nice ordinary guy’ really did do the worst crime, and deliberately killed his 3 children out of hatred for their mother. Just because he repeatedly...”Read full review »
radioland via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/02/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I’m finding it super hard to listen to this one, it’s very distressing for any parent to listen too. He tells the police his son opened the door and it hit his nose and he closed the door before claiming to try to reopen it and save them!!! Regardless if my child opened their door and hit my...”Read full review »
Sarahlouise32 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
05/31/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The guy was convicted twice and you’re trying to tell us he is innocent. Makes me feel sick.”
Leahcim991356268 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/23/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
