Written with a clear (biased) agenda.
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“It’s disappointing just how biased this podcast is.
It appears it’s author has attempted to negate pieces of evidence which suite their narrative.
Let’s not forget this man threatened to drown his children, a fact acknowledged but glazed over by the writer.
Then the independent witness which you tried to prove couldn’t have seen into the car only to discover you could see into the car. I’m a little surprised you didn’t cut this during editing. So your focus moved on to trying to discredit her timings.
You bring in experts then tell them there is no history of DV. Last time I checked physically assaulting your partner and threatening to kill her children are some pretty serious examples of DV.
Your podcast is highly biased and cherry picks a narrative to suite your agenda.
Two jury’s of his peers, and the court of appeal all agree. This man is a monster who murdered his three children on Father’s Day to get back at his wife.”
Chris11726 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/30/24
More reviews of Trial by Water
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Well produced podcast, looking forward to coming episodes”
Treasureslip via Apple Podcasts ·
New Zealand ·
06/19/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The guy was convicted twice and you’re trying to tell us he is innocent. Makes me feel sick.”
Leahcim991356268 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/23/24
“He has been tried and convicted twice. How this is considered quality investigative journalism is beyond me.
Shame on you Channel 9/ and The Age”
gemmy73 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/13/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
